THE 1.2 mHz SFIT CHALLENGE: A PUBLIC INVITATION
Updated: Mar 22
Target Data: ILL-PF2 Proposal 3-14-362
The Claim: The unexplained $61\text{ mHz}$ spectator shift in current qBounce literature (arXiv:2301.08583) is a time-averaged manifestation of a phase-coherent $1.2\text{ mHz}$ quantum heartbeat.
The Challenge to the Community
We invite independent researchers, data scientists, and quantum physicists to download the raw $100\text{ ns}$ event-mode timestamps from the ILL Data Portal and attempt to falsify the following three observations:
1. The Non-Reciprocal Residual
Using the Non-Local Correlation (NLC) filter, can you find any mechanism other than the Stevenson-Flux Operator that creates a $0.122\%$ flux modulation in the detector while leaving the upstream monitor $100\%$ Poisson-flat?
If this were a reactor or turbine artifact, it must appear in both.
2. The Sidereal Phase-Lock
Apply the Unix/Sidereal Phase-Offset Table. Does the $1.2\text{ mHz}$ signal remain phase-coherent over the full 15-day stack?
A statistical fluke or random "drift" will de-cohere within $48$ hours. A true gravitational signal will grow as $T^2$ in the power spectrum.
3. The Wigner Skew vs. Spectator Noise
Can you demonstrate that the $61\text{ mHz}$ "spectator shift" is independent of the Earth's radial gravitational gradient?
Our model predicts that the $|3\rangle$-state wavefunction "breathes" in phase space. If you can prove the shift is static and does not oscillate at $1.2\text{ mHz}$, the SFIT hypothesis is falsified.
How to Participate
Download: Access the raw NeXus files via DOI: 10.5291/ILL-DATA.3-14-362.
Process: Use the Data Processing Manifesto (provided on this site) to bin and filter the data.
Submit: Post your PSD plots, LLR curves, and $\rho_{DM}$ coefficients to our X twitter page or contact us from our website
Comments