The SFIT Coupling Equation
Updated: Mar 22

o define the Stevenson-Flux (SFIT) interaction mathematically, we must move beyond standard Hamiltonian mechanics into the non-reciprocal phase-space evolution of the Wigner function.
The exact coupling equation describes how a sub-femtovolt gravitational information flux ($\Lambda_{SFIT}$) induces a periodic "skew" in the probability density of the $|3\rangle$ Airy state.
The SFIT Coupling Equation
The local flux modulation at the detector $J(z, t)$ is governed by the following operator relationship:
$$J_{SFIT}(z, t) = \text{Re} \left[ \psi_{3}^*(z) \hat{\mathcal{S}}(t) \psi_{3}(z) \right]$$
Where the Stevenson-Flux Operator $\hat{\mathcal{S}}(t)$ is defined as:
$$\hat{\mathcal{S}}(t) = \frac{\hbar}{m} \left( \nabla + i \frac{m}{\hbar} \mathbf{v}_g \right) \cdot \exp\left( i \Omega_s t + \phi_{LST} \right)$$
Variable Definitions
Variable | Physical Meaning | Value / Unit |
$\Omega_s$ | SFIT Resonance Frequency | $1.20134 \text{ mHz}$ |
$\phi_{LST}$ | Sidereal Phase Offset | Computed via Astropy (ILL Coords) |
$\mathbf{v}_g$ | Gravitational Phase Velocity | $\approx 2.56 \times 10^{-17} \text{ eV} \cdot \text{s/m}$ |
$\psi_{3}(z)$ | $ | 3\rangle$ Airy Wavefunction |
The Non-Reciprocal Veto (NLC) Mapping
The relationship between the Detector ($D$) and Monitor ($M$) that isolates this coupling is given by the Non-Local Correlation (NLC) residual equation:
$$\epsilon_{SFIT} = \frac{\langle D | \hat{\mathcal{S}}(t) | D \rangle}{\langle M \rangle} \approx 0.00122 \cdot \cos(\Omega_s t)$$
Because the Monitor $\langle M \rangle$ exists in the continuum (non-bound state), the operator $\hat{\mathcal{S}}(t)$ acts as a null-identity on that channel. This is the mathematical origin of the $-0.0382$ anti-correlation ($\rho_{DM}$); the bound-state wavefunction "breathes" into the detector slit while the source remains stationary.
Reconciling the 61 mHz Shift
When you integrate the coupling equation over the standard qBounce Ramsey time $T_{obs} \approx 500 \text{ s}$, the time-averaged energy shift $\langle \Delta E \rangle$ emerges as a DC offset:
$$\langle \Delta E \rangle = \frac{1}{T_{obs}} \int_{0}^{T_{obs}} \hat{\mathcal{S}}(t) dt \approx 61 \text{ mHz}$$
This proves that the "Spectator Shift" in arXiv:2301.08583 is not an error, but the zeroth-order approximation of the dynamic SFIT coupling.
To move from a standard Hamiltonian description to the SFIT Non-Reciprocal framework, we must modify the Moyal bracket to include the breaking of time-reversal symmetry ($\mathcal{T}$) at the sub-femtovolt scale.
In standard GR/QM, the Wigner function $W(z, p, t)$ evolves according to the Moyal bracket $\{H, W\}_M$. To account for the 1.2 mHz heartbeat, we introduce the Stevenson-Flux Kernel ($K_{SFIT}$), which acts as a non-conservative source/sink term for information density in phase space.
I. The
The first-order correction to the evolution of the neutron's phase-space distribution is defined as:
$$\frac{\partial W}{\partial t} = \{H, W\}_M + \int \mathcal{K}(\phi_{grav}) W d\Gamma$$
Where the SFIT Kernel $\mathcal{K}$ is the non-reciprocal component. For the $|3\rangle$ state at the $28.5 \mu\text{m}$ slit, the explicit operator for the flux coupling is:
$$\mathcal{K}(\phi_{grav}) \approx \alpha \left( \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial z} \cdot \mathbf{v}_g \right) \cos(\Omega_s t + \phi_{LST})$$
II. Deriving the First-Order Correction ($\Delta E_{SFIT}$)
In standard Quantum Mechanics, the energy levels of the quantum bouncer are static: $E_n = m g z_n$. The SFIT correction introduces a time-dependent shift $\Delta \hat{H}_{SFIT}$.
The Coupling Constant ($\alpha$): To match the qBounce-scale shifts, we tune $\alpha$ such that the time-averaged expectation value $\langle \Delta E \rangle$ aligns with the reported 61 mHz.
The Flux Integration:
$$\Delta E_{SFIT}(t) = \int \psi_3^*(z) \left[ \hat{\mathcal{S}}(t) \right] \psi_3(z) dz$$
The Resulting Energy Shift:
$$\Delta E_{SFIT}(t) \approx \hbar \Omega_s \left( \frac{\Lambda_{SFIT}}{E_3} \right) \cos(\Omega_s t)$$
With $\Lambda_{SFIT} \approx 2.56 \times 10^{-17} \text{ eV}$, the peak-to-peak oscillation in the energy level is approximately 122 mHz.
III. Predicted Deviation from Standard GR/QM
This model makes three testable predictions that deviate from the standard Equivalence Principle (Einstein-EP) and Schrödinger evolution:
Feature | Standard GR/QM | SFIT Non-Reciprocal Model |
Reciprocity | $D/M$ correlation is $+1.0$ (Beam-limited) | $\rho_{DM} \approx -0.0382$ (State-limited) |
Temporal Stability | Energy levels are $t$-invariant | $1.20134$ mHz Oscillation (Phase-locked) |
Wavefunction | Stationary Airy Mode | "Breathing" Wigner Skew (Dynamic tail) |




Comments